Archive for November 2011
Some interesting thoughts on numbers (most of these came a recent Spirit magazine I read on a flight to California):
- Stolen credit cards sell for as little as 7 cents each on-line.
- The Statue of Liberty, at 151 feet tall, wears a size 879 shoe.
- It costs 1.8 cents to manufacture a penny. Not bad, when compared to the 9.2 cents required to manufacture a nickel. Is anybody else really ready for Google Wallet? Sign me up! In 2010, the U.S. Mint lost $27.4 Million. Any wonder?
- Only 55 of the 122 runners that started the race, crossed the finish line of the first New York City Marathon in 1970. In 2010, 45,000 entrants crossed the line.
- The U.S. Postal Service processes 6,516 pieces of mail every second. WOW!
- In 2010, snail mail volume was down 20 percent from 2006. The Postal Service only delivered 170 billion pieces of mail. That same year, 107 trillion email messages were delivered to your inbox.
- Betty Crocker might not be real, but on her 75th anniversary in 1996 General Mills digitally blended photographs of 75 women to create her new likeness. Each of the photographs embodied a specific trait or value that the iconic Betty Crocker stood for.
Where do you fit into the Value/ Price positioning model?
Buyers think in terms of value for money; what they get for what they pay. As a seller, you must have a value position for your product or service. Each of these six positions has a particular market.
- More for More. Specializing in offering the most upscale version and charging a high price. Often the price exceeds that actual increment of quality, and prestige is a factor. Examples are Rolls Royce, Cuban cigars, and Nordstrom.
- More for the Same. Companies have been able to attack a “more for more” product or service by claiming comparable quality and performance but priced much lower. These are usually high end products with superior product attributes but is priced on par with the competition. Lexus positions its cars at the same price point as Mercedes, but offers a lot more features. Dell positioned its Xeon based servers as value for money when compared to Sun’s UltraSparc server.
- The Same for Less. This position is possible if a firm can profitably deliver it’s products or services which are on par with that of premium products from the competition at a price which is lower than that of the premium priced product. To be successful in this space, you need to create a strong brand differentiation first. This is the differentiation strategy for E-commerce sites on the Internet and discount stores. Examples are Costco, Target, Amazon,and private label food products.
- Less for Much Less. Some people complain that a product or service provides more than they require but they still have to pay the higher price. A “less for much less” position overcomes this objection. An example is Southwest Airlines, the most profitable airline, charges much less by not serving food, not assigining seats and not using travel agents.
- More for Less. The winning value proposition would be to offer prospects and customers “more for less”. This is the attraction of highly successful businesses like Wal-Mart.
- Less for More. This is a pricing position that is doomed to failure.
Most companies compete in the value for money positions of “more for the same” or “the same for less”. Where does your product or service fit?
Are you busy playing the pricing game? Is your low price the main differentiator between you and your competitors?
Re-think this strategy. It’s more a route to business suicide than a strategy. Consumers facing a purchase decision go through a consistent process.
- Problem recognition
- Information Search
- Evaluation and Selection of Alternatives
- Decision Implementation
- Post-purchase Evaluation
OK. there are some purchases wherein a step or two are skipped. A low impact purchase like a hamburger is based many times on how hungry are you and where is the nearest place to eat.
While there are many studies and sources of information on the Consumer Information Processing Model shown above, our discussion is really based on where does price fall in the hierarchy of making a purchase decision?
If, for instance, you where contemplating the purchase of a new car, what are some of the things you’d consider from step three (as shown above)?
- Brand loyalty
- Dealer attitude
- Serviceability (does the intended purchase actually fill a need)
- Proximity (how far are you willing to drive to get it)
- Peer pressure (or peer review)
- Knowledgable Sales and Service staff
- Available inventory (do they have the make/ model/ color that you want)
If price was your ONLY consideration… you’re telling me that NOTHING else matters? There are always additional considerations other than price. I’ve never seen a study where price ranked higher than third on the list of important considerations when someone is making something other than a low-impact purchase decision.
This decision making model can be applied to many different types of purchases. What are some of the considerations your clients look at when making the decision to do business with you? Become your own customer. Grab a sheet of paper and make a list. If you were buying your product or service from yourself – what elements would you consider in the Evaluation and Selection of Alternatives step?
Where did price fall on that list? If price is the main or worse – only – differentiator between you and your competition, then perhaps you should go sell hamburgers.
Why are some companies leaders?
- Apple invests in innovative ideas and research.
- Johnson & Johnson understands and addresses my uniques needs.
- Google genuinely wants to make a difference in the world.
- General Mills upholds transparent communication practices.
- Hershey is honest and trustworthy.
We all should be striving to research and innovate to stay fresh. This might be related directly to a product that you sell. Or it could be an innovative way to package a services that you offer.
Al of our customers deserve to be understood and feel that their unique needs have been addressed. Without applying a little Johnson & Johnson to our transactions, our customer will feel like we just processed them – like there was no relationship between us. Haven’t you felt this way before?
I genuinely want to help my clients become more successful at what they do. Isn’t that making a difference in the world. I think so.
If our clients can’t communicate openly and transparently with us, they’ll look for somebody that they can have that kind of working relationship with. Do you recall any recent instances where transparent communication wasn’t available to you in a business transaction?
Throughout our endeavors, honesty and trustworthiness should shine through. Whether you can help or not. Whether you can answer the question or not. Be honest. Prove that you can be trusted.
Living our lives and running our businesses with these qualities in mind will help us all make our dent in the universe.
The answer appears to be YES. As of October 18th, Google has been blocking keyword data in Google Analytics. This article from the amplify-interactive.com blog explains this in more detail. After reading the article and doing additional research, here’s what I’ve found out:
- This directly impacts you if the user who searched and ultimately clicked an Search Engine Results Page link to your site was logged into Google with a Google account at the time they clicked.
- Google claims that this only impacts approximately 7 percent of searches. I’m not sure if I buy into that figure or not, but it came from a credible podcast at www.sitepoint.com.
- There is a way to see the missing data. It is in your Webmaster Tools data. This is also accessible from inside the new Analytics interface, under the Search Engine Optimization link. You have to have your Webmaster Tools account tied to your Analytics account to see this.
I have checked several of my client sites and haven’t seen a real impact yet. You can bet that I’ll be keeping an eye on this situation moving forward.